We hear it every year the night and day following Selection Sunday: “Tech was hosed! State was screwed!”
Sometimes the arguments are iffy-at-best, sometimes they suck. This year, its clear as night and day that a team was screwed: Marshall.
Twitter erupted like Mount St. Helens after Iona was selected as one of the last four teams in the NCAA tournament last night, and for good reason. Sure, Iona played a tough non-conference schedule. I’ll give you that they beat some tough RPI 51-100 teams. But so did Marshall, and then some. Lets compare.
(Click to enlarge.)
Facts:
- Marshall has a significantly better non-conference and overall strength of schedule rating, something Jeff Hathaway (NCAA committee chairman) said the committee liked about Iona.
- Marshall’s RPI is 3 points lower than Iona overall and 32 points lower in the non-conference schedule.
- Marshall is 4-6 against the Top 50, Iona is 0-2.
- Iona is 5-3 against the Top 100, Marshall is 6-10.
- Iona has 4 bad losses, Marshall has 3.
- Iona bowed out in the semi-finals of the MAAC tournament, Marshall made the finals in a significantly better conference (10 vs. 20 in KenPom rating.)
- Wins against NCAA teams: Iona (3: none of which are at-larges, RPIs: 78, 80, @135) – Marshall (5: vs 21, 21, 40, @42, 58)
- Perhaps the most damning evidence is that Marshall beat Iona by 19 in December.
For comedic purposes, Marshall wasn’t even in the last four out. Translation: they didn’t just miss the tournament.
Hey, but what do I know about resumes, I’m not on the NCAA selection committee. What I do know is that a team with significantly more Top 50 wins, more wins against NCAA caliber teams and better strength of schedule numbers was thrown to the curb for a team with less of the aforementioned NCAA at-large criteria.
Oh yeah, lets not forget that Marshall beat Iona by 19 points like the selection committee apparently did.
Marshall was hosed. Marshall was screwed.
Filed under: Selection Sunday, What the!? | Tagged: Iona Gaels, Marshall Thundering Herd, Selection Sunday |
Leave a comment